| Sr. No. | Name of the Applicant | States/UT | Brief of Order in Appeal (OIA) | Order No. & Date | Download | Category |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3001 | M/s Skilltech Engineers & Contractors Private limited | Karnataka | 1. “Whether the contract, executed by them for KPTCL, is a divisible contract [Supply of goods & Supply of Services] or an indivisible contract [ works contract]?” 2. “Whether the tax rate of 12% [CGST-6% + SGST-6%] is applicable to the above contract, in pursuance of Notification No.24/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 21.09.2017?” |
03 dated 21-03-2018 | 97 (2)(a ) (b) | |
| 3002 | M/s. Inox Air Products Pvt. Ltd. | Gujarat | i.Whether the activity undertaken by the applicant amounts to “Job Work” as defined under Section 2(68) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (herein after referred to as the ‘CGST Act, 2017’) ? |
GUJ/GAAR/R/2018/7 dt. 21.03.2018 | 97(2)(a)(c)(g) | |
| 3003 | M/s. Rashmi Hospitality Services Private Limited | Gujarat | One of the customer, who is recipient of services, has given the contract for catering services to be provided to the staff and premise for services to be provided for canteen has also been made available to the applicant, which is non Air-conditioned. Whether rate of tax on their supplies made to the recipient would be 12% or 18% ? |
GUJ/GAAR/R/2018/8dt. 21.03.2018 | 97(2)(e) | |
| 3004 | M/s Giriraj Renewables Private ltd. | Karnataka | a) Whether supply of turnkey Engineering, Procurement & Construction (‘EPC’) Contract for construction of solar power plant wherein both goods and services are supplied can be construed to be a Composite Supply in terms of Section 2(30) of CGST Act, 2017. |
01 dated 21-03-2018 | 97 (2)(e ) (g) | |
| 3005 | Reliance Infrastructure Limited | Maharashtra | i. Whether reinstatement charges paid to Municipal Authorities would be liable to GST? ii. Whether access charges paid to Municipal Authorities would be liable to GST? |
GST-ARA-11/2017/B-14 Mumbai, dt. 21.03.2018 | 97(2) (a) | |
| 3006 | Reliance Infrastructure Limited | Maharashtra | i. Whether reinstatement charges paid to Municipal Authorities would be liable to GST? ii. Whether access charges paid to Municipal Authorities would be liable to GST? |
GST-ARA-11/2017/B-14 Mumbai, dt. 21.03.2018 | 97(2) (a) | |
| 3007 | M/s AnanyaGoel | Uttar Pradesh | Manufacturing food as take away only with no sitting facility, is a restaurant service or manufacturing of goods. |
UP_AAR_01 dated 21.03.2018 | 97(2)(a) | |
| 3008 | M/S Siddhu Mal Paper Conversion Com Pvt. Ltd. | Uttar Pradesh | उ0प्र0 राज्य सरकार द्वारा लागू ई-वे बिल की अनिवार्यता है अथवा नही । |
UP_AAR_02 dated 21.03.2018 | 97(2)(b) | |
| 3009 | Hafele India Pvt. Ltd. | Maharashtra | Whether Caesar stone imported by the applicant can be classified under HSN Code 2506 or 6810? |
GST-ARA-10/2017/B-14 Mumbai, dt. 20.03.2018 | 97(2) (a) | |
| 3010 | M/s Divisional Forest Officer, Dehradun | Uttarakhand | Whether GST is leviable on the "Marg Sudharan Shulk" and "Abhivahan Shulk" charged by Forest Division Dehradun from the non-government, private and commercial vehicles engaged in mining work in lieu of use of forest road. |
01/2018-19 20/03/2018 | 97(2) (e) |





