| Sr. No. | Name of the Applicant | States/UT | Brief of Order in Appeal (OIA) | Order No. & Date | Download | Category |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 61 | Shri Ramanujam Tulsi Ramadas | Karnataka | a) Whether Marginal Scheme is Applicable to me on used car purchase and sale? b) HSN Code and Rate of Tax and Assessable Value? c) Any other Suggestion? |
KAR.ADRG 22/2026/ dated 16.03.2026 | 97(2)(b), 97(2)(e) & 97(2)(f) | |
| 62 | M/s Jeeth Imports and Exports | Karnataka | Can we claim GST refund under "Any other" category in case if we have already filed a NIL refund application inadvertently under a particular category (Refund of ITC on export of Goods & Services without payment of Tax, in the present case)? |
KAR.ADRG 24/2026/ dated 16.03.2026 | 98(2) | |
| 63 | M/s Narayani Green Private Limited | Karnataka | Application withdrawn by the Applicant. |
KAR.ADRG 14/2026/dated 16.03.2026 | 97(2) | |
| 64 | M/s Ani Technologies Pvt. Ltd. | Maharashtra | Q1: In light of the aforesaid proposed model-I, whether the Applicant would qualify as an Ecommerce operator under Section 2 (45) of the CGST Act? Q 2: In the light of aforesaid proposed model-I, whether the Applicant would be liable to pay GST on the proposed model of supply of passenger transportation services by the driver partners to the customers in terms of Section 9 (5) of the CGST Act read with Notification No. 17/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017? Q 3: In the light of aforesaid proposed model-I, whether the Applicant would be treated as 'supplier' in respect of the passenger transport services provided by the driver partners to the end customer? Q 4: In light of the aforesaid proposed model- II, whether the Applicant would qualify as an E-Commerce operator under Section 2 (45) of the CGST Act? Q 5: In the light of aforesaid proposed model- II, whether the Applicant would be liable to pay GST on the proposed model of supply of passenger transportation services by the driver partners to the customers in terms of Section 9 (5) of the CGST Act read with Notification No. 17/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017? Q6: In the light of aforesaid proposed model-II, whether the Applicant would be treated as 'supplier' in respect of the passenger transport services provided by the driver partners to the end customer? |
Order No GST-ARA-08/2024-25/B45, Mumbai Dted.13.03.2026 | 97(2) | |
| 65 | M/s Repos IOT India Private Limited | Maharashtra | What is the HSN Code & GST Rate on sale of SPV Refueller? |
Order No GST-ARA-40/2023-24/2025-26/B-43,Mumbai Dated.09.03.2026 | 97(2) | |
| 66 | M/s. Sivanmalai Andavar Ginning Factory | Tamil Nadu | The application filed by the Applicant for Advance Ruling is rejected in terms of Section 98(2) of CGST 2017, for non-filing of GST ARA-01 application as mentioned in the Rule 104 of the CGST Rules, 2017. |
TN/26/ARA/2026, Dated 09.03.2026 | 97(2) (a)(c)(e) | |
| 67 | M/s. Peritus Solutions Pvt. Ltd. | Tamil Nadu | The application filed by the Applicant for Advance Ruling is rejected in terms of Section 98(2) of COST 2017, for non-filing of manual application as mentioned in the Rule 107A of the COST Rules, 2017. |
TN/25/ARA/2026, Dated 09.03.2026 | 97(2) (a)(e)(c) | |
| 68 | M/s. Vrudhii Enterprises | Tamil Nadu | The application filed by the Applicant for Advance Ruling is rejected in terms of Section 98[2) of CGST 2017, for non-filing of manual application as mentioned in the Rule 107A of the CGST Rules, 2017 and non-payment of application fee as prescribed under section 97(1) of COST Rules, 2017. |
TN/23/ARA/2026, Dated 06.03.2026 | 97(2)(a)(b) | |
| 69 | M/s. Grayeye IT Systems Pvt. Ltd. | Tamil Nadu | Q1.E-way Bill generation- validity and applicability. |
TN/21/ARA/2026, Dated 05.03.2026 | 97(2)(a)(c) (g) | |
| 70 | M/s. A V Cargo Migrators LLP | Tamil Nadu | Q1. Whether the applicant satisfies the definition of an "E-commerce operator" or do they satisfy the definition of "Goods Transport Agency"? Q2. What is the taxability of services provided by the applicant? |
TN/20/ARA/2026, Dated 05.03.2026 | 97(2)(a) |





