| Sr. No. | Name of the Applicant | States/UT | Appeal Order No. & Date | Brief of Order in Appeal (OIA) | Download | AR Order No. and Date, against which Appeal has been filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 101 | M/s Shalby Limited | Gujarat | GUJ/GAAAR/APPEAL/2022/22 Dated.06.10.2022 | Whether the medicines, consumables and implants used in the course of providing health care services to in-patients for diagnosis or treatment for patients opting with or without packages along with allied services i.e. (room rent/food/doctor fees etc.) provided by hospital would be considered as “Composite Supply” and accordingly eligible for exemption under the category “Health Care Services. |
GUJ/GAAR/R/31/2021 dated 19.07.2021 | |
| 102 | M/s Sivantos India Pvt. Ltd. | Karnataka | KAR/AAAR/07/2022 dated 21.11.2022 | The parts and accessories of hearing aids merits classification under heading 90219010 and are not entitled for exemption under entry 142 of Notification 2/2017 CT(Rate) dated 28.06.2017 but are chargeable to tax rate of 18% in terms of in terms of entry No 453 of Schedule III to Notfn No 01/2017 CT(Rate) dated 28.06.2017. |
NO.KAR.ADRG 27/2022 dated 12-08-2022 | |
| 103 | M/s Myntra Designs Pvt. Ltd. | Karnataka | KAR/AAAR/06/2022 dated 21.11.2022 | Appellate authority remanded the case to the Advance Ruling Authority for a fresh consideration after taking into account the observations made by the Appellate Authority. |
NO.KAR.ADRG 19/2022 dated 01-07-2022 | |
| 104 | M/s Coperion Ideal Private Limited | Uttar Pradesh | 04/AAAR/14/10/2022 dated 14/10/2022 | Supply of imported goods i.e. component needed for Pneumatic Conveying System made by the appellant to its customers on High Sea sales basis will not be treated as supply of "goods" by vertue of entary 8(b) to the Schedule III of CGST Act, 2017 as amended, with effect from 01.02.2019 Howeever, the supply of "services" in relation thereto, if any, will fall under the purview of "supply" as defined under Section 7 of the CGST Act. |
UP ADRG-01/2022 dated 25.04.2022 | |
| 105 | M/s. Kasturba Health Society | Maharashtra | "MAH/AAAR/DS-RM/13/2022-23 dated 05.12.2022 | The Maharashtra Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, hereby, concur with the impugned advance ruling pronounced by the MAAR in respect of the question no. (i), (ii) and (iii)(b). Furthermore, modify the ruling of the MAAR with regard to question number (iii)(a), (iii)(c) and (iii)(d), and hold that- |
GST-ARA-120/2018-19/B-90 dated 10.11.2021 | |
| 106 | Accurex Biomedical Pvt. Ltd. | Maharashtra | "MAH/AAAR/AM-RM/12/2022-23 30.09.2022" | The Maharashtra AAAR has set aside the MAAR Order No. GST-ARA-98/2019-20/B-72 dated 11.10.2021 by holding that both the impugned products, i.e., CRP Test Kit and HbAlc Test kit, will be classified under chapter heading 3002, and accordingly, both the product will attract GST at the rate of 5% |
"GST-ARA97/ 2019-20/B-91 dated 10.11.2021" | |
| 107 | Parker Hannifin India Pvt. Ltd. | Maharashtra | "MAH/AAAR/AM-RM/11/2022-23 30.09.2022" | The Maharashtra AAAR has set aside the impugned Advance Ruling Order No. GST-ARA-109/2019- 20/8-112 dated 15.12.2021 by holding that the impugned product, CNG Dispenser, will be covered by SI. No. 422, Schedule III ofNotification No. 01/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017. |
GST-ARA-109/2019-20/B-112 dated 15.12.2021 | |
| 108 | Mahavir Nagar Shiv Shrusti Co-Operative Housing Society Ltd. | Maharashtra | "MAH/AAAR/AM-RM/10/2022-23 30.09.2022" | The Maharashtra AAAR do not find any reason to interfere with the Advance Ruling passed by the MAAR vide Order No. GST-ARA-19/2021-22/B-94 dated 10.11.2021 wherein it has been held that the Appellant-society is not eligible to avail ITC of the tax paid on the works contract services received from their appointed contractor in terms of the limitations provided under section 17(5)c) of the CGST Aet, 2017, as they cannot be said to be providing works contract services to their members. |
GST-ARA-19/2021-22/R-94 dated 10.11.2021 | |
| 109 | M/s KRBL Infrastructure Private Limited | Uttar Pradesh | UP/AAAR/03/2022 dated 30.09.2022 | Accordingly, we hold that the appeal filed by the Appellant is not admissible in eye of law and therefore, it is dismissed on the ground of limitation itself without going into the merits of the case. |
Order No-UP ADRG-90/2021 dated 17.12.2021 | |
| 110 | M/s HYT Engineering Company Private Limited | Uttar Pradesh | UP/AAAR/02/2022 dated 15.07.2022 | Question-1 Whether the work awarded to the appellant is a composite supply of works contract service. Answer-1 Yes, it is a composite supply of works contract service. Question-2 Whether the benefit of Sl No. 3(v)(a) of the Notification No. 11/2017-Central Tax (Rate), as amended vide Notification No. 20/2017-Central Tax (Rate) ia applicable ti the subject works. Answer-2 They are eligible to take the benefit of Sl No. 3(v)(a) of the Notification No. 11/2017-Central Tax (Rate), as amended vide Notification No. 20/2017-Central Tax (Rate) for the subject work. |
Order No. UP ADRG 92/2022 dated 24.01.2022 |









