Authority for Advance Ruling (AAR)

i.  Whether such services provided by third party Canteen and Transport contractor (having already suffered tax), be regarded once again as supply of services rendered by Applicant Company to its employees in the course or furtherance of business as per Section 7 r/w Schedule I of the Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017, just by the reason that "part cost incurred " has been recovered from its employees, as agreed upon.

ii.  Whether part recovery of cost from employee can be said to be "consideration earned" by  the Applicant towards supply of services under the GST Act, 2017 and be subjected to GST.

iii.  If such part recovery of cost to be regarded as value and consideration received for supply of facilitation / support services made in the course or furtherance of business, by the Applicant Company, what is the tax amount which is required to be paid on such recoveries and the applicable SAC code?

iv.  And if the tax is to be paid on such recovery of "part cost incurred” from the employees, treating it as " taxable outward supply of service referred above at question iii" made "in the course or furtherance of business” as provided in Section 7 of CGST Act, 2017 r/w Schedule I, can the Applicant Company be allowed ITC credit to that extent, as per Section 16 of CGST Act, 2017, which also coins the word as "used in the course or furtherance of business". More so due to the reason, if such levy is imposed on premise that it is taxable supply at the hands of Applicant Company, then credit needs to be allowed.

1. Whether the relaxations provided vide the notification of 35/2020 – Central tax Dated April 3, 2020, for completion of various compliance actions would apply to the time limit provided for the export of goods under notification no. 41/2017 – Integrated tax (rate) Dated October 23, 2017.

2.  Whether under the facts and circumstances of the present case, even where the goods were exported on 10 June 2020 with a delay of one day over and above the 90 days specified as under notification no. 41/2017 – Integrated tax (rate) Dated October 23, 2017, the benefit of concessional rate of 0.1% IGST would still be available in view of the extension of time limit granted by notification of 35/2020 – Central tax Dated April 3, 2020

Whether the supply of Stator Coil by the Applicant to M/s.Coral Manufacturing Works India Private Ltd., will be eligible for the levy of 2.5% CGST in terms of Sl. No. 234 in the notification 1-CTR dated 28 June 2017 and 2.5% SGST in terms of the corresponding SGST notification

1.Supply of raw water falls under exempt goods under GST. Does raw water that is supplied through tankers through the Bookwater platform come under exempted goods as well?

2. Does the supplier of water through tankers come under supply of raw water or under transport services?

3. Does Bookwater have to withhold any tax-GST TCS 1% from the suppliers before making payments for the supply of raw water through our platform?

4. Is the supplier making raw water sale is required to register under GST since they are transacting through an e commerce operator?

5. Does Sewage Evacuation come under 18% GST? If yes, most individual sewage tanker operators have turnover less than 20lakhs per annum. Since we are not billing the customer directly and are only billing on behalf of the supplier, will the exemption limit of Rs.20Lakhs per annum be applicable to suppliers individually?

6. Consequently, is GST Registration applicable for all suppliers through the Bookwater platform or only applicable for those suppliers who have a turnover over 20Lakhs?

7. Does Bookwater have to withhold any tax (GST TCS 1% applicability) from the suppliers before making payments since the supplies have been made through our digital platform and we also deduct our charges for our services rendered before making payments?

Whether the GST paid on the Motor cars of seating capacity not exceeding 13 (including Driver) leased or rented to customers will be available to it as INPUT TAX CREDIR (ITC) in terms of Section 17(5)(a)(A) of Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017?

2. Whether the GST paid on the Motor cars of seating capacity not exceeding 13 (including Driver) registered as public vehicle with RTO to transport passengers, provided to their different customers on lease or rental or hire will be available to it as INPUT TAX CREDIT (ITC) in terms of Section 17(5)(a)(B) of Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017.

3. Whether the supply of services by way of Renting or Leasing or Hiring Motor Vehicles to SEZ to transport the employees of the customers without payment of IGST under LUT is deemed as taxable supply and whether ITC is admissible on Motor Vehicles procured and used commonly for such supply to SEZ and other than SEZ supplies?

a. The firm supplies food in a day out package along with sports and adventure activities, whether it constitutes mixed supply? If yes, what is the rate of GST? 
b. If services provided on a day out package along with food, what is the GST rate? Or can food be charged at 5% GST? 
c. If a customer avails only restaurant facility, what is the GST rate? 
d. When the room tariff is below Rs.7,500/- per day, what is the GST rate for room rent and what is the GST rate for the food supplied to room? 
e. The corporate companies book rooms/halls for their meetings & other occasions where food is supplied as complementary, whether it constitutes mixed supply if yes, what is the rate of GST? Or can GST of 5% be charged for the food seperately?
f. If any person avails only restaurant facilities only, what is the percentage of GST? But the Applicant requested to permit them to withdraw the application filed for advance ruling vide their letter dated 24.08.2021. Hence the application filed by the appliclant for advance ruling is disposed off as withdrawn.

"Whether Tamarind seeds are taxable or exempt under GST Act." But the applicant, vide their letter dated 16.08.2021, has informed this authority that they wish to withdraw their application. Further the applicant has to discharge fee of Rs.5,000/- each in terms of Section 97(1) of the CGST Act 2017 as well as KGST Act 2017, whereas the applicant has discharged the fee of Rs.5,000/- only under KGST Act 2017 and hence the instant application is liable for rejection under Section 98(2) of CGST Act 2017. The application filed by the Applicant for advane ruling is hereby rejected for the reasons mentioned above.

"Rate of GST applicable to "Areca Leaf Plates" Machine pressed) But the Applicant, vide their email dated 29.10.2021, has informed this authority that they wish wish to withdraw their application. Further the applicant has to discharge fee of Rs.5,000/- each in terms of Section 97(1) of the CGST Act 2017 as well as the KGST ACt 2017 , whereas the applicant has discharged the fee of Rs.5,000/- under KGST Act 2017 only and hence the instant application is liable for rejection under Section 98(2) of the CGST Act 2017. The application filed by the Applicant for advane ruling is hereby rejected for the reasons mentioned above.

"We do job work of slitting, cut to length and matt finishing of stainless steel sheets with HSN code 9988. Further above type of job work what value to be mentioned in e-way bill whether goods value or job work charges only." But the applicant, vide their letter dated 17.08.2021, requested this authority to permit them to withdraw the instant application filed for advance ruling, for the reason that, they have got the clarifications for the question from Circular No.126/45/2019-GST dated 22.11.2019, issued by CBIC. However, the issue on which the applicant has sought advance ruling is not in respect of any of the issues covered under Section 97(2) of the CGST/KGST Act 2017. Further the applicant has to discharge fee of Rs.5,000/- each in terms of Section 97(1) of the CGST Act 2017 as well as KGST Act 2017, whereas the applicant has discharged the fee of Rs.5,000/- under KGST Act 2017 only and hence the instant application is liable for rejection under Section 98(2) of CGST Act 2017. The application filed by the Applicant for advane ruling is hereby rejected for the reasons mentioned above.

i. Rate of tax on trailers registered to be used for agriculture purpose.
ii. Rate of tax on trailers without tipping kit and to be registered for use for agricultural purposes. But the Applicant, vide their letter dated 16.08.2021, requested to permit them to withdraw the instant application, filed for advance ruling. Further the applicant has to discharge fee of Rs.5,000/- each in terms of Section 97(1) of the CGST Act 2017 as well as the KGST Act 2017, whereas the applicant has discharged the fee of Rs.4,975/- only under the KGST Act 2017 & only Rs.25/- under the CGST Act 2017 and hence the instant application is liable for rejection under Section 98(2) of the CGST Act 2017. The application filed by the Applicant for advane ruling is hereby rejected for the reasons mentioned above.