Authority for Advance Ruling (AAR)

1. Whether services provided by Padmavathi Hospitality & Facilities Management Services (PHFMS) to DME are classifiable as a function entrusted to a Panchayat or a Municipality under the constitution? If not then can we conclude that no exemption is available to PHFMS?

2. Whether services provided by PHFMS to DME is exempted under Sl.No.3 of Notification 12/2017 Central Tax dated 28.06.2017 read along with amendment dated 25.01.2018?

3. Whether Services provided by PHFMS to DME including institutions of Government Hospitals and colleges are liable for GST or not? If yes, what is the rate of GST applicable to these services

4. Whether services rendered by PHFMS to DME can be classified as pure services or Composite Supplies?

1Whether the services of construction of the R&R Colony supplied by the Applicant would be taxed as a part of the composite supply of mining service or the same would be taxed separately as a supply of works contract service.
2.Whether the Applicant will be eligible to avail Input Tax Credit of tax paid to the sub-contractor on works contract services for construction of R&R colony, or the same would be disallowed in terms of Section 17(5)(c) of the CGST Act, 2017.

a. Whether the impugned supply can be regarded as ‘composite supply’ and whether the rate of tax of the principal supply could be adopted for the whole of supplies?

b. The applicant hereby seeks determination in respect of the following specific questions:

i. Whether sale of LPG, Collection of Take or Pay Charges for not lifting minimum assured quantity and rental charges for supplier gas system installed at the customer premises to store the LPG which is a condition precedent for supply of LPG be treated as composite supply under section 2(30) of GST Act, 2017?

ii. Whether supply/sale of LPG be treated as principal supply for above mentioned transaction?

1.The applicant is providing residential land on lease basis for which they are charging or receiving lease premium whether GST is leviable or not?
2.Please also clarify whether GST is leviable on the maintenance charges and lease rent received on such residential land.

1. Whether the construction of Institute of Security and Law Enforcement Studies at Addu City in Maldives, constructed for Government of Maldives under an Memorandum of Understanding between India and Maldives falls within the GSTnet?

2. Who is the recipient of service in the instant case?

3 What is the place of supply in respect of the works contract for setting up of seating up of the Institute of Security and Law Enforcement Studies at ADDU City in Maldives?

1.  Applicability of GST on Repair and maintenance fund and sinking fund.

2. Whether or not exemption Limit of Rs.7500/- per member is applicable on above two  components of maintenance bill by the housing co-operative Society to members of  society.

1. Whether Labor supply to Government Departments from a Register dealer under GST Act like providing Drivers, Peons, Housekeeping Data Entry operators and other clerical staff attracts exemption fron levy of GST as per Notification Nos.11/2017-CT(Rate) and 12/2017CT(Rate) both dated 28th June 2017.
2. Whether above said supply of services covered under “Pure Labor Services” as per Service Accounting Code (SAC) under chapter No.99.
3. The dealer apply for work as per tender (E-procurement) as a “Contractor to supply labour” and TDS as per Income tax Act deducted U/s 194C (As a Contractor or Sub-Contractor) @ 1%. So, why not dealer to be treated as a Contractor under GST Act 2017 also?

1. ITC on GST paid on canteen facility is blocked credit under Section 17 (5)(b)(i) of CGST Act and inadmissible to applicant.

2. GST, at the hands on the applicant, is not leviable on the amount representing the employees portion of canteen charges, which is collected by the applicant and paid to the Canteen service provider.

i. Whether the value of assets which are outside the purview of GST is required to be included in the value of assets for the purpose of apportionment towards transfer of input tax credit in case of de-merger in terms of Section 18(3) of CGST Act, 2017 read with Rule 41(1) of CGST Rules, 2017?
ii. If the answer to Question
(i) is yes, whether following assets are required to be considered for the purpose of determining the value of assets for apportionment towards transfer of input tax credit in case of de-merger in terms of Section 18(3) of CGST Act, 2017 read with Rule 41(1) of CGST Rules, 2017:
a) Assets which are created only to comply with the requirements of the Accounting Standards;
b) Assets which are not being transferred as part of de-merger.
iii. If the answer to Question I and / or 2 are yes, whether the assets which are not attributable to any particular GSTIN be considered in the GSTIN of the head office of the Company for the purpose of computation of asset ratio?

    
1. whether the incentives received under “Atma Nirbhar Gujarat Sahay Yojna” dated 16.05.2020 declared by the Gujarat Govt. could be considered as subsidy and not chargeable to tax?

2. whether the incentive received under said scheme could be considered as supply of service under the provisions of Section 7 under CGST Act?

3. whether the incentive received under said scheme if considered as supply then would it be covered under Sub Section 2 of Section 7 of CGST Act?

4. whether the incentive received under said scheme could be considered as excluded from the value of taxable supply under clause (e) of