Authority for Advance Ruling (AAR)

Whether the construction service provided by the Applicant to M/s Provident Housing Ltd., under the project ‘Provident Neora, & Provident Capella” & to M/s Puravankara Ltd., under the project Provident Parksquare” qualifies for application of lower rate of CGST @ 6% and SGST @ 6% as provided in Sl.No.3-Item (V) sub item(da) vide Notification No.11/2017-CT (Rate) dated 28.06.2017?

i. Whether the applicant is liable to collect and pay goods and services tax on amount received from the PWD Department as per revised estimate in respect of work namely "Construction of bridge across Kumaradhara river on Kudmar Shanthimogru Sharavoor Alankar Road at KM 1.20 in Shanthimogaru of Puttur Taluk?
ii. Whether the applicant is liable to collect and pay goods and services tax on amount received from the Executive Engineer, Public Works, Inland Water Transport Department, Mangalore Division or
iii. Whether the PWD Department is liable to pay Goods and Service Tax under the GST Act or VAT Tax under Karnataka Value Added Tax Act?

GST applicability of cost of the diesel incurred for running DG Set in the course of providing DG Rental Service?

Whether the Pure Services provided to Zilla Panchayat, City corporations, Educations Institutions, and Rural Water Supply Divisions are exempted under article 243G and 243W?

1. Whether Labor supply to Government Departments from a Register dealer under GST Act like providing Drivers, Peons, Housekeeping Data Entry operators and other clerical staff attracts exemption fron levy of GST as per Notification Nos.11/2017-CT(Rate) and 12/2017CT(Rate) both dated 28th June 2017.
2. Whether above said supply of services covered under “Pure Labor Services” as per Service Accounting Code (SAC) under chapter No.99.
3. The dealer apply for work as per tender (E-procurement) as a “Contractor to supply labour” and TDS as per Income tax Act deducted U/s 194C (As a Contractor or Sub-Contractor) @ 1%. So, why not dealer to be treated as a Contractor under GST Act 2017 also?

i. Whether the value of assets which are outside the purview of GST is required to be included in the value of assets for the purpose of apportionment towards transfer of input tax credit in case of de-merger in terms of Section 18(3) of CGST Act, 2017 read with Rule 41(1) of CGST Rules, 2017?
ii. If the answer to Question
(i) is yes, whether following assets are required to be considered for the purpose of determining the value of assets for apportionment towards transfer of input tax credit in case of de-merger in terms of Section 18(3) of CGST Act, 2017 read with Rule 41(1) of CGST Rules, 2017:
a) Assets which are created only to comply with the requirements of the Accounting Standards;
b) Assets which are not being transferred as part of de-merger.
iii. If the answer to Question I and / or 2 are yes, whether the assets which are not attributable to any particular GSTIN be considered in the GSTIN of the head office of the Company for the purpose of computation of asset ratio?

Whether (i) transportation of raw paddy from the point of purchase to the rice mill and (ii) reimbursement of Mandi labour charges in respect of customs milling of paddy are taxable or not

1. Appropriate HSN Code applicable to supply of i. Fruit bowl containing only cut fresh fruits (Individually or mixture of different fruits). ii. Fruit bowl containing both cut fresh fruit and dry fruits and nuts.
2. GST tax rate applicable for each of the classified goods above?
3. Eligibility to input tax credit of GST paid on plant and machinery and expenses relating to the business in case the end product is classified as belonging to 0% tax rate under GST?

(1) Whether the tax invoice dated 01.04.2020 issued by the supplier of service for the rental service supplied for the period 01.04.2018 to 31.03.2019 is hit by the limitation for claiming ITC under sub-section (4) of Section 16 of the CGST/SGST Act, 2017?
(2) If the applicant avails ITC on such invoice after 01.04.2020 and before filing GST return for September 2021/Annual Return for 2020-2021, whether it amounts to violation of condition stipulated under sub-section (4)?

1. Whether the “Tertiary Treated Water” supplied by the applicant to Maharashtra State Electricity Generating Co. Ltd. (MAHAGENCO) is taxable under the GST law?
2. If yes, what will be the rate of GST?