Authority for Advance Ruling (AAR)

Sr. No. Name of the Applicant States/UT Brief of Order ­in ­Appeal (OIA) Order No. & Date Download Category
1781 Prasa Infocom & Power Solutions PVT LTD Maharashtra

Whether supply of goods and service by Prasa Infocom & Power Solutions Private Limited to Cray Inc. (Cray) qualify as 'works contract' as defined under Section 2(19) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (CGST Act)? 

GST-ARA-26/2019-20/B-43, Mumbai, dated 18.03.2020

(Size: 2.61 मेगा बाइट)

97(2)(a), (e) & (g)
1782 Sundharams Private Ltd Maharashtra

Whether it is entitled to avail Input tax credit under CGST/SGST Act in respect of taxes to be paid on its purchase of Paver Blocks laid on the land?

GST-ARA-36/2019-20/B- 41 , Mumbai, dated 18.03.2020

(Size: 2.72 मेगा बाइट)

97(2)(d)
1783 Madhurya Chemicals Maharashtra

A.  Whether the classification of ‘Shatamrut Chyavan’ falling under TSH 2309 90 10 of Customs Tariff Act, 1975 as adopted to GST attracting ‘NIL’ rate (0%) of IGST (0%) CGST + (0%) SGST) as per List of Exempted Goods as per Sr. No. 102 of Notification No. 02/2017 - Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017 is correct or not?

B. Whether the goods falling under TSH 2309 90 10 of Customs Tariff Act, 1975 as adopted to GST can be treated as ‘waste of sugar manufacture, whether or not in the form of pellets under heading 2303’ attracting 5% of IGST (2.5% CGST + 2.5% SGST) as per Schedule I (Sr. No. 104) of Notification No. 01/2017 - Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017 or not?

GST-ARA-33/2019-20/B-40 , Mumbai, dated 18.03.2020

(Size: 1.95 मेगा बाइट)

97(2)(a)
1784 A Raymond Fasteners India Pvt. Ltd Maharashtra

Whether Threaded metal nuts which function same as standard nut, merits   classification under the Tariff item 7318 16 00 & not under Tariff item 8708 99 00?

GST-ARA-47/2019-20/B-33, Mumbai, dated 17.03.2020

(Size: 2.31 मेगा बाइट)

97(2) (a)
1785 M/s. Sterlite Technologies Ltd Gujarat

Supply of goods to the customers located outside India under ‘Bill to Ship to’ Model from vendor located outside India.

GUJ/GAAR/R/04/2020 dated 17.03.2020

(Size: 93.38 किलोबाइट)

97(2)(a)
1786 M/s. Pratham Agro vet Industries Gujarat

The product Rice Bran(22+oil) shall be classified under Chp heading 38259000  and attracts rate 9 % CGST and 9 % SGST under vide Sr no 98 of Schedule III of notification no.1/2017-Central Tax (Rate) of CGST Act and corresponding notification of SGST Act.

GUJ/GAAR/R/05/2020 dated 17.03.2020

(Size: 60.14 किलोबाइट)

97(2)(a)
1787 Apsara Co-operative housing Society Limited Maharashtra

1) Whether the activities carried out by the applicant for its members qualify as "supply" under the definition of Section 7 of the CGST Act, 2017.

2) If the activities of the applicant are treated as "supply" under CGST Act, 2017 then whether the applicant has correctly discharged the GST as per the illustrative copy of the invoice generated by the Applicant? 

GST-ARA-21/2019-20/B-34 , Mumbai, dated 17.03.2020

(Size: 3.11 मेगा बाइट)

97(2)(e) &(f)
1788 Saint-Gobain India Private Limited Maharashtra

1. Whether the proposed product is classifiable as "Glass-fibre Reinforced Gypsum Board" and the applicant can avail the benefit of the concessional rate of tax under Schedule II of Notification no - 1/2017 - Central Tax? 

GST-ARA-51/2019-20/B- 38 , Mumbai, dated 17.03.2020

(Size: 1.5 मेगा बाइट)

97(2)(b)
1789 CEAT Limited Maharashtra

1. Whether dealer is required to reverse input tax credit proportionate to the reduction in the value of supply?

2. Whether the applicant can issue commercial credit note to its dealers for post sale discounts without charging GST? 

GST-ARA-41/2019-20/B-37, Mumbai, dated 17 .03.2020

(Size: 1.37 मेगा बाइट)

97(2)(c )
1790 WOODKRAFT INDIA LIMITED Maharashtra

1. Whether in the facts & circumstances of case an applicant is liable to pay GST in respect of Tax invoice No 01 dated 25/06/2018 / R.A. bill No 22 for Rs. 2,42,09,594/- toward civil and interior work done of M/s Oil & Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. under provision CGST ACT.
2. If the ruling on above question is affirmative, kindly be clarified rate of tax applicable thereon. 
3. Whether in the facts and circumstances of case an applicant is liable to pay GST on proposed 
reimbursement of Rs. 1,92,50,247/- from M/s Oil & Natural Gas Corporation Ltd., toward operational site expenses and claim toward rectification of water damages, pertaining original 
civil & interior work contract awarded by M/s Oil & Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. 
4. If the ruling on above question is affirmative, kindly be clarified rate of tax applicable thereon. 

GST-ARA-24/2019-20/B-35, Mumbai, dated 17 .03.2020

(Size: 2.56 मेगा बाइट)

97(2)(e)