Appellate Orders

Uttarakhand Appellate Authority on Advance Ruling upheld the order passed by Authority for Advance Ruling.

We uphold the order No. KAR ADRG 54/2021 dated 29/10/2021 passed by the advance ruling authority and the appeal filed by the Appellant M/s. Time Technoplast Ltd, stands dismissed on all accounts.

We uphold the order No. KAR ADRG 52/2021 dated 29/10/2021 passed by the Advance Ruling Authority and the appeal filed by the Appellant M/s. Workplace Options India Pvt Ltd, stands dismissed on all accounts.

In view of the above discussions and findings and the CBIC’s Circular No. 163/19/2021-GST dated 6th October 2021, issued under F.No. 190354/ 206/2021-TRU, we hold that concessional GST rate of 12% is applicable on all goods falling under heading 3822, vide Entry at S.No. 80 of Schedule II of notification No.1/2017-Integrated Tax (Rate) dated 28.6.2017, including to Laboratory Reagents being imported and supplied by the Appellant.

In view of the discussions and findings, we find that the transactions executed in the course of contractual obligation of an agreement of employment are beyond the scope of GST as clarified in the Press Release dated 10.07.2017, of CBIC.
We hold that provisioning of transport facility provided by the Appellant is exclusive of the contractual obligation of the employer in the course of employment. The same shall be liable to GST, on a value that exceeds the total gift value up to Rs. 50000/- given by the Appellant to an employee availing this facility in a financial year.

In view of the above discussions and findings, we dismiss the appeal and uphold the Advance Ruling dated 03.12.2018 as the same does not suffer from any infirmity or illegality. The AAR has correctly held that the nature of the Applicant’s services is of input services.

Whether company is eligible to take ITC on such business promotion expenses or not?

Ruling: No. Applicant is not eligible to take ITC on such business promotion expenses

In view of the above discussions and findings, we dismiss the appeal and upheld the Advance Ruling dated 28.08.2020 as the same does not suffer from any infirmity or illegality.

The Rulings are, however, as given under: -
QUESTION-1
"Whether PLS collected along with consideration for sale of properties attracts GST rate of 12% or 18% where sale/transfer of constructed property has taken place before issuance of completion/Occupation certificate (CC/OC)?”
RULING:
PLS collected along with consideration for sale of properties attracts GST rate of 18% where sale/transfer of constructed property has taken place before issuance of completion/Occupation certificate (CC/OC).
QUESTION-2
“Whether PLS collected along with consideration for sale of properties attracts GST rate of 5% or 18% where sale/transfer of constructed property has taken place before issuance of CC/OC under new projects which commence on or after 01.04.2019?”
RULING:
PLS collected along with consideration for sale of properties attracts GST rate of 18% where sale/transfer of constructed property has taken place before issuance of completion/Occupation certificate (CC/OC) under new projects which commence on or after 01.04.2019.
QUESTION-3
“Whether PLS collected along with consideration for sale of properties is outside the scope of supply where sale/transfer of constructed property is entered into by the Applicant after issuance CC/OC?”
RULING:
No. The PLS collected along with consideration for sale of properties where sale/transfer of constructed property is entered into by the Applicant after issuance CC/OC, is not outside the scope of supply.
QUESTION-4
“If as per above question, PLS attracts concessional rate of tax/exemption (whether 12% or 5% or nil as the case may be), whether, in facts and circumstances of the case, Applicant/or customers can claim adjustment/refund of the excess GST amount paid as (18% less 12%) or (18% less 5%) or (18% less Nil), as the case may be, on such charges?”
RULING:
No. The Applicant/or customers cannot claim adjustment/refund of the GST amount paid as there cannot be any excess GST) paid in respect of the SAC 99799 which attracts the GST rate of 18% (CGST 9% + SGST 9%).
QUESTION-5
“In case differential prices are charged for sale/transfer of different properties/units in a real estate project due to various commercial factors such a location of apartment etc., whether GST can be charged on whole price at the similar rate i.e.12% (in case of sale before issuance of CC/OC)/5% % (in case of sale before issuance of CC/OC under new projects which commence on or after 01.04.2019)/Nil % (in case of sale after issuance of CC/OC)?”
RULING:
No. The Preferential Location Service is a separate service than Construction Service. Therefore for determining the Value of the same, the Paragraph-2 ibid to the Notification 11/2017-CT(R) dated 28.06.2017 which is applicable exclusively to the Construction Service, shall not be applicable.

The Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling hold that Input Tax credit against the GST paid on purchase and fabrication of the motor vehicle used for carrying cash and bullion is available to the appellant.