Advance Ruling No. GUJ/GAAR/R/11/202 dated 20-01-21 void ab-initio in terms of Section 104 of CGST Act.

1. Under which HSN Code should the following goods be classified: The wastes, namely,

a. Cinder Half-burnt Coal / Char Dolachar and

b. ESP / Bag Filter Dust generated during the process of manufacturing Sponge Iron under DRI process?

2. Would the GST Compensation Cess @ Rs.400/- per tonne be applicable on sale of waste, i.e. Cinder Half-burnt coal, generated during the said process?

The goods are classified as Lassi at HSN 040390 and is exempt from GST.

The Instant Mix Flours/Mix Flours of: (i)Gota (ii) DakorGota (iii) MethiGota (iv) Khaman (v) Dhokla (vi) Idli (vii) RavaIdli, (viii) Dosa (ix) Upma (x) Dahiwada (xi)  Dalwada (xii) Menduvada (xiii) Handvo and (xiv) Khichu are classifiable under HSN. 2106 90(Others) attracting 18% GST (9% CGST + 9% SGST).

Time of supply and point of taxation with respect to flats allotted to land owner by the builder by way of supplementary agreement on 15.05.2017(i.e., before GST regime) where as the construction will be completed during GST regime.

a. Is this date to be concluded as the date of allotment for payment of service tax in respect of construction services provided to landlord ignoring the fact that the construction was continued subsequently from May, 2017 to November, 2018.

b. Will it be sufficient and adequate compliance, if the appellant complies law and remit entire service tax on the entire area earmarked to landlord.

c. Once the time of supply is clarified and ruled, the appellant will plan for remittance of tax accordingly on hearing from office.

d. In the event the service tax is remitted based on the date of above supplementary agreement, will the appellant not required to comply with GST on the said value of service to land owner.

e. Will this view in transitional period have any impact on the future projects to be explored by the applicant company.

f. What is the ‘Constructed complex’ referred to in the notification.

Withdrawal

1. Whether the pallets, crates and containers (hereinafter referred as "equipment") leased by CHEP India Private Limited (hereinafter referred to as "CIPL" or the "applicant") located amd registered in Karnataka to its other GST registration located across India (say CIPL, Kerala) would be considered as lease transaction and accordingly taxable as supply of services in terms of Section 7 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 ("CGST Act") and Karnataka Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 ("KGST Act")?
2. If the answer to Question 1 is yes, what is the value on which GST has to be charged i.e. whether it should be lease charges or the value of equipment in terms of Section 15 of the CGST Act and KGST Act read with relevant Rules?
3. What are the documebts that should accompany the movement of goods from CUPL, Karnataka to CIPL, Kerala?
4. Whether movement of equipment from CIPL, Kerala to CIPL, Tamil Nadu on the instruction of CIPL, Karnataka can be said to be mere movement of goods not amounting to a supply in terms of Section 7 of the CGST Act and KGST Act, and thereby not liable to GST?
5. With reference to Question 4 above, what are the documents that should accompany the movement of the goods from CIPL, Kerala to CIPL, Tamil Nadu?

Rectification order passed under section 102 of the CGST/KGST Act 2017

Whether the Product can be classified under HSN code 25140000 or 68030000?

1. Whether APEPDCL can be treated as a limb of Government of AP or not?

2.  What is the rate of tax of the work executed and also under which SAC/ HSN code the work falls?

3. Whether the tribal sub works, which are implemented with 100% grants given by Government of AP are liable to be taxed at the rate of 12% or 18%?