| Sr. No. | Name of the Applicant | States/UT | Brief of Order in Appeal (OIA) | Order No. & Date | Download | Category |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 31 | M/s. Admiralty Inspection and Analytical Services | Tamil Nadu | Advance Ruling is rejected in terms of Section 98(2) of CGST 2017, for non-filing of manual application as mentioned in the Rule 107A of the CGST Rules, 2017 and non-payment of application fee as prescribed in the Rule 104 of the CGST Rules, 2017. |
Advance Ruling No.39/ARA/2026, dated 17.04.2026 | 97 (2) | |
| 32 | M/s. Ashok Textile Mills Private Limited | Tamil Nadu | Advance Ruling is rejected in terms of Section 98(2) of CGST 2017, for non-filing of manual application as mentioned in the Rule 107A of the CGST Rules, 2017 and non-payment of application fee as prescribed in the Rule 104 of the CGST Rules, 2017. |
Advance Ruling No.36/ARA/2026, dated 16.04.2026 | 97 (2) | |
| 33 | M/s. Ligoria Marine Private Limited | Tamil Nadu | Advance Ruling is rejected in terms of Section 98(2) of CGST 2017, for non-filing of manual application as mentioned in the Rule 107A of the CGST Rules, 2017 and non-payment of application fee as prescribed in the Rule 104 of the CGST Rules, 2017. |
Advance Ruling No.38/ARA/2026, dated 16.04.2026 | 97 (2) | |
| 34 | M/s. Park Avenue Owner's Welfare Association | Tamil Nadu | Advance Ruling is rejected in terms of Section 98(2) of CGST 2017, for non-filing of manual application as mentioned in the Rule 107A of the CGST Rules, 2017 and non-payment of application fee as prescribed in the Rule 104 of the CGST Rules, 2017. |
Advance Ruling No.37/ARA/2026, dated 16.04.2026 | 97 (2) | |
| 35 | M/s. Pure Tropic | Tamil Nadu | Advance Ruling is rejected in terms of Section 98(2) of CGST 2017, for non-filing of manual application as mentioned in the Rule 107A of the CGST Rules, 2017 and non-payment of application fee as prescribed in the Rule 104 of the CGST Rules, 2017. |
Advance Ruling No. 34/ARA/2026, dated 13.04.2026 | 97(2) | |
| 36 | M/s. LR Fabrications Private Limited | Tamil Nadu | Advance Ruling is rejected in terms of Section 98(2) of CGST 2017, for non-filing of manual application as mentioned in the Rule 107A of the CGST Rules, 2017 and non-payment of application fee as prescribed in the Rule 104 of the CGST Rules, 2017. |
Advance Ruling No.35/ARA/2026, dated 13.04.2026 | 97(2) | |
| 37 | M/s Vedant Construction | Maharashtra | 1. Whether supply of flats to MHADA identified customers after Occupancy Certificate (OC) is exempted from levy of GST being it is sale of immovable property which is not liable to GST? If it is treated as taxable supply next query is, 2. In these circumstances if it is treated and held as taxable supply assuming that being "services of works contract service" is rendered to MHADA identified 20% flats then what is the value of supply for GST? Whether it is MHADA dictated value of supply or Market value of supply? |
NO. GST-ARA- 42/2021-22/B-54 dt. 30.03. 2026 | 97(2) | |
| 38 | M/s Sanctum Trading Corporation Pvt. Ltd. | Maharashtra | 1. The Applicant supplies imported goods stored in his bonded warehouse to foreign-going vessels, Indian Navy Ships and Indian Coast Guard Ships. Will these outward supplies be treated as Export Sales (Zero-rated Supply) under GST? 2. If these outward supplies are treated as Export Sales, then under LUT, can these items be exported without payment of IGST? |
Order No GST-ARA-09/2021-22/B52, Mumbai Dated. 30.03.2026 | 97(2) | |
| 39 | M/s Rockline construction | Maharashtra | 1. Whether the supply being made is pure service or composite supply, where supply of goods does not exceed more than 25% of the value of the supply? 2. Whether the recipient is Government, Local Authority, Governmental Authority or Government Entity? 3. Whether supply is being made in relation to any function entrusted to a Panchayat or a Municipality under the Constitution? 4. Whether the applicant is eligible for exemption of services being provided by way of pure service or composite supply based on Entry 3A w.e.f. 25.01.2018 vide Notification No. 2/2018-CT(R) which needs to be clarified by way of Advance Ruling? |
Order No GST-ARA-67/2021-22/B-53, Mumbai Dated.30.03.2026 | 97(2) | |
| 40 | M/s Sunil Vishvasrao Khune | Maharashtra | 1. Whether the activity of construction/ developing commercial units on vacant plot of land being acquired as capital asset out of surplus funds be treated as in the course or furtherance of business in respect of income generated on account of following transactions: a. Sale of commercial units to prospective buyers b. Rent received on leasing of commercial units 2. If yes, whether input tax credit be eligible for inputs & input services used for the construction of commercial units in case of above transactions i.e. a. Sale of commercial units to prospective buyers b. Rent received on leasing of commercial units |
NO.GST-ARA- 54/2020-21/B- 51 Mumbai, dt. 30/03/2026 | 97(2) |







