Authority for Advance Ruling (AAR)

Sr. No. Name of the Applicant States/UT Brief of Order ­in ­Appeal (OIA) Order No. & Date Download Category
2641 Cummins India Limited Maharashtra

Determination of GST liability by deciding principal supply of the composite supply qua maintenance contracts executed between the customer and the Applicant. 

NO.GST-ARA- 65/2018-19/B- 161 Mumbai dated 19.12.2018

application-pdf(Format: pdf, Size: 2.85 MB)

97(2) (i) (v)
2642 NES GLOBAL SPECIALIST ENGINEERING SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED Maharashtra

Question :- Whether the transaction in question is a Zero Rated Supply or a Normal Supply  under the GST ACT?

Question :- If the said supply is a Zero Rated Supply, then can the same be considered as an export of service under the GST Act?

NO.GST-ARA- 52/2018-19/B- 160 Mumbai dated 19.12.2018

application-pdf(Format: pdf, Size: 3.23 MB)

97(2) (v)
2643 Allied Digital Services Ltd. Maharashtra
  1. Whether the amount received for supply of services during the post GST period to the Government of Maharashtra (Home Department) as per the contract in question are taxable under  SGST/CGST Act ?

   2. If answer to the question No.1 is in affirmative then what is the rate of tax under SGST/CGST? 

NO.GST-ARA- 90/2018-19/B- 159 Mumbai dated 19.12.2018

application-pdf(Format: pdf, Size: 4.93 MB)

97(2) (i) (ii) (v) (vii)
2644 Blackstone Diesels Rajasthan

Tax rate on “Air dryer complete with final filter for used in breaking system of locomotive supplied to Railway” as per order attached given by Western Railway.

RAJ/AAR/2018-19/26 Dated 18.12.2018

application-pdf(Format: pdf, Size: 2.62 MB)

97(2) (e)
2645 Sam Overseas Uttarakhand

GST Rate of Tax on-              

(i) Rejected wheat Seed     (ii) Rejected Paddy Seed

13 Dated 18.12.18

application-pdf(Format: pdf, Size: 1.52 MB)

97(2) (a)
2646 ALLIED BLENDERS AND DISTILLERS PRIVATE LIMITED Maharashtra

Whether in the facts and circumstances of the present case, the Contract Bottling Unit is making a taxable supply to the Applicant (i.e. Brand Owner), or, alternatively, whether the Applicant (i.e. brand owner) is making a taxable supply to the Contract Bottling Unit? Correspondingly, whether in the facts and circumstances of the present case, the Applicant (i.e. Brand Owner) is paying consideration to the Contract Bottling Unit by way of bottling charges, or, alternatively, whether the Contract Bottling Unit is paying consideration to the Applicant by way of brand owner surplus?

NO.GST-ARA- 67/2018-19/B- 155 Mumbai dated 15.12.2018

application-pdf(Format: pdf, Size: 4.25 MB)

97(2) (v)
2647 M/s NAGRANI WAREHOUSEING PRIVATE LIMITED Madhya Pradesh

In the application the applicant raised following question that

"Determination of classification of sacks and bags made from man made textile materials under GST tariff No. 6305 which falls under Serial No. 224 of Scchdule-1 of Notification No. FA3-33-2017-1-V (42) dated 29.06.17 issued vide Madhya Pradesh Gazette. However at the time of personal hearing the applicant himself admitted that the question raised was not very clear so amended the question as follow:

"Determining the classification of P.P. Bags which are made from strips having width of less than 5mm. It is to be decided by the Hon'ble Advance ruling authority as to whether the aforesaid PP bags would classify under chapter heading 63 or chapter 39 of the GST Tariff and what shall be the rate of GST on     the same?”

MP/AAR/21/2018 Dated 14.12.2018

application-pdf(Format: pdf, Size: 3.44 MB)

97(2) (a), (b) & (e)
2648 M/S SPFL Securities Ltd. Uttar Pradesh

Taxability on delayed payment charges on reimbursement of amount by client to applicant, where client failed to pay amount paid to stock Exchanges for purchase of securities with T+1 (Trading day plus one day) under SEBI regulation norms and deducted by Stock Exchange from Applicant’s account being purchase consideration of securities which are neither goods nor services under GST.

UP_AAR_18 dated 14.12.2018

application-pdf(Format: pdf, Size: 1.9 MB)

97(2)(e)
2649 M/S Data Matics Global Services Ltd. Uttar Pradesh

(i) Whether a contract can be treated as Composite Contract under GST if it involves making of supply of goods and services which are inter- connected and inter- dependent on each other even though BOQ mentions separate value of goods and services.

(ii) Whether a pre GST period contract can be treated as Composite Contract in GST even though there was separate Sale and Service billing in Pre- GST period

(iii) Whether contract for designing, installation and setting up of Automatic fare collection, system for Lucknow Metro Project shall amount to a Composite Contract with Principal Supply being Supply of Service or Work Contract.

(iv) GST rate to be charged on LMRC Project i.e. Whether 18% or 12% to be charged after considering Rate Change Notification No. 1/2018- Integrated Tax (Rate) dated 25/01/2018 and all other provisions of GST Laws.

UP_AAR_19 dated 14.12.2018

application-pdf(Format: pdf, Size: 6.27 MB)

97(2)(a)
2650 M/S Hariom Enterprises Uttar Pradesh

Whether non Laminated Bags manufactured by the Applicant from HDPE/PP Strips of width not exceeding 5mm, used for packing sugar (sugar bag), Flour (Flour bag), Food grain (Grain Bag) and other similar bags are classifiable under Tariff Heading 6305 or heading 3923 of the Customs Tariff Act and (ii) what is the rate of GST on such non laminated bags manufactured by the applicant.

UP_AAR_20 dated 14.12.2018

application-pdf(Format: pdf, Size: 3.07 MB)

97(2)(a)