Sr. No. | Name of the Applicant | States/UT | Brief of Order in Appeal (OIA) | Order No. & Date | Download | Category |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2751 | Popular Motor World (P) Ltd. | Kerala | Whether the valuation under Rule 32(5) of the GST Rules, 2017 can be adopted for sale of ‘demo cars’. Later the applicant sought permission to withdraw the application. |
CT/779/18-C3 DATED 26/03/2018 | 97(2)(c) | |
2752 | Roulunds Braking India (Pvt.) Ltd, Sonipat | Haryana | Brake Pad and Auto Parts, whether to fall under ITC HSN 87083000 attracting 28% GST or ITC HSN 6813 attracting 18% GST? |
Advance Ruling No.3, dated 26.03.2018 | 97(2)(a) | |
2753 | M/s Maheshwari Stone Supplying Co., Tandur, Vikarabad | Telangana | (i) In which Chapter the commodity called “Polished/Processed limestone slabs” falls? (ii) Under which HSN Code the above commodity comes? (iii) Can it be classified as “Mineral substances not elsewhere specified or included” which is mentioned under HSN Code 2530?] (iv) Can it be classified under any of the HSN Codes 2515/2516/2521? (v) Can it be retained under HSN Code 25 with inaugural phrase of “Goods not mentioned elsewhere” as mentioned at the start of column of 5%? |
02/2018 dt. 25/03/2018 | 97(2)(a) | |
2754 | Acrymold | Maharashtra | 1. If the word TROPHY is specifically mentioned under 83062920, so can we sell all trophies made of any material under this HSN? 2. If different code is allocated to trophies assembled of different material, I would like to know if there is a combination of different materials and about 75% (value terms) is getting used of any one Raw Material, under which HSN should we make bill ? |
GST-ARA-12/2017/B-15 Mumbai, dt. 23.03.2018 | 97(2) (a) | |
2755 | Aditya Birla Retail Ltd. | Maharashtra | (a) Whether the subject goods, proposed to be sold under Stream 1, where the package of the subject goods would merely have a declaration mentioning the name and registered address of the Applicant as the manufacturer, as per the statutory requirement under Subject Statutory Provisions, can be considered as ‘not bearing a brand name’, and, accordingly eligible for exemption from GST in terms of relevant entries to Notification No. 2/2017 Central tax (Rate) dated 28th June 2017 (‘CGST Notification’), and, the corresponding entries under Notification No. 2/2017-Intergrated tax (Rate) dated 28th June 2017 (‘IGST Notification’) and Notification No.2/2017-State Tax (Rate) dated 29th June 2017) [collectively referred to as ‘the Exemption Notifications’]? (b) Whether the subject goods proposed to be sold under Stream 2, where the package of the subject goods would have a declaration mentioning the name and registered address of the manufacturer as per the statutory requirement under the Subject Statutory Provisions as also the declaration ‘Marketed by- Aditya Birla Retail Limited’ can be considered as ‘not bearing a brand name’, and, accordingly eligible for exemption in terms of relevant entries to the Exemption Notifications? (c) Whether the declarations made on the package, by inter alia using common/ generic terms viz. ‘Value’, ‘Choice’ and ‘Superior’, for the sole purpose of indicating the quality of the product so as to enable the customers to identify and buy products based on their requirements, budget and preferences can be construed to be a ‘brand name’ for the purpose of the Exemption Notifications? |
GST-ARA-13/2017/B-16 Mumbai, dt. 23.03.2018 | 97(2) (b) | |
2756 | Tata Motors Limited | Maharashtra | 2. For a motor vehicle to get covered under above entry as SUV/ UV, whether it has to satisfy only the conditions mentioned in main clause i.e. engine capacity above 1500 cc and popularly known as SUV/ UV or in addition, it has to also satisfy the conditions mentioned in Explanation" i.e. length exceeding 4000 mm and ground clearance of 170 mm and above? In short, if the vehicle satisfies only the conditions mentioned in main clause but is not satisfying any one or all of the conditions mentioned in Explanation', whether it would still be covered under Entry at Sr. No. 52B of Notification No. 1/2017-Compensation Cess (Rate) dated 28.06.2017 as amended? 3. For the purpose of Cess @ 22% under Sr. No: 52B of Notification No. 1/2017 Compensation Cess (Rate) dated 28.06.2017 as amended, whether the ground clearance of the vehicle is to be considered in laden condition or in unladen condition? 4. Whether Tata Harrier vehicle whose ground clearance in unladen condition is 205 mm and in laden condition is 160 mm, would fall under Sr. No. 52B of the Notification No. 1/2017-Compensation Cess. (Rate) dated 28.06.2017 as amended? 5. Whether GST Compensation Cess @ 22% under Sr. No. 52B of Notification No. 1/2017-Compensation Cess (Rate) dated 28.06.2017 as amended, will be applicable to Tata Harrier vehicle? 6. Vehicle whose ground clearance in unladen condition is more than 170 mm but below 170mm in laden condition, whether will get covered under Sr. No. 52B of Notification No. 1/2017-Compensation Cess (Rate) dated 28.06.2017? |
NO.GST-ARA- 104/2018-19/B- 32 Mumbai dated 22.03.2019 | 97(2) (a)&(e) | |
2757 | Reliance Infrastructure Limited | Maharashtra | i. Whether reinstatement charges paid to Municipal Authorities would be liable to GST? ii. Whether access charges paid to Municipal Authorities would be liable to GST? |
GST-ARA-11/2017/B-14 Mumbai, dt. 21.03.2018 | 97(2) (a) | |
2758 | M/s. Inox Air Products Pvt. Ltd. | Gujarat | i.Whether the activity undertaken by the applicant amounts to “Job Work” as defined under Section 2(68) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (herein after referred to as the ‘CGST Act, 2017’) ? |
GUJ/GAAR/R/2018/7 dt. 21.03.2018 | 97(2)(a)(c)(g) | |
2759 | M/s. Rashmi Hospitality Services Private Limited | Gujarat | One of the customer, who is recipient of services, has given the contract for catering services to be provided to the staff and premise for services to be provided for canteen has also been made available to the applicant, which is non Air-conditioned. Whether rate of tax on their supplies made to the recipient would be 12% or 18% ? |
GUJ/GAAR/R/2018/8dt. 21.03.2018 | 97(2)(e) | |
2760 | Reliance Infrastructure Limited | Maharashtra | i. Whether reinstatement charges paid to Municipal Authorities would be liable to GST? ii. Whether access charges paid to Municipal Authorities would be liable to GST? |
GST-ARA-11/2017/B-14 Mumbai, dt. 21.03.2018 | 97(2) (a) |